Puka Nacua Responds To Allegations – Explains Reason For Biting Woman At New Year’s Eve Party & Leaving Teeth Marks In Her
This article was originally published on Total Pro Sports.

Rams star wideout Puka Nacua is facing some nasty allegations this week. A woman alleges Nacua made an antisemitic comment and bit her during a group outing on New Year’s Eve 2025. TMZ first reported the allegations on Tuesday.
The alleged victim filed a temporary restraining order against Nacua, according to the publication. She also filed a police report.
This is just one of many head-scratching moments from Puka. Along with his immense amount of talent has come a growing series of headaches over the last few months. The latest Nacua incident could land the star wideout in some hot water legally and with the NFL.
Puka Nacua Doesn’t Deny The Biting Allegations

The accusations come from a woman who filed for a temporary restraining order related to an alleged incident in the Century City area of Los Angeles. In the filing, she claims that Nacua made a profane, antisemitic comment during dinner.
She further alleges that after the group left dinner and entered a sprinter van. That is when, allegedly, Nacua became “touchy-feely” and later bit her friend’s thumb and her shoulder, allegedly causing injury. He bit so hard that it left a mark.
The woman says she reported the incident to the police the following day.
Nacua, through his attorney, has spoken out about the incident. His attorney, Levi McCathern, has denied the most serious aspects of the allegations. The alleged antisemitic remark is “completely false,” with the attorney saying witnesses did not hear Nacua make such a statement.
However, he stated that the alleged bite was “horseplay” rather than intentional harm. He stated the bite left only a temporary mark, not a serious injury. McCathern has also indicated that Puka Nacua may pursue defamation action against the accuser.
“The whole claim is nothing more than a shakedown attempt,” McCathern said. “And he says the woman has asked for millions.”
In the meantime, a judge in Los Angeles rejected the woman’s request for a temporary restraining order, though the matter is not fully resolved. A court hearing is scheduled for April 14.
